Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 1.724
Filtrar
1.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 19(1): 231, 2024 Apr 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38589910

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Internal and external fixation are common surgical procedures for treating fractures. However, the impact of different surgical approaches (including internal and external fixations) on patients' psychological status and Quality of Life (QoL) is rarely examined. Herein, we aimed to investigate the effects of internal and external fixation on anxiety, depression, insomnia, and overall mental and physical health in Distal Radius Fractures (DRF) patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study on 96 fracture patients who underwent internal fixation (57 patients) or external fixation (39 patients). The Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS), and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire were used to assess the patients' pain, anxiety, depression, sleep, and QoL before surgery and at seven days, one month, and three months post-surgery. RESULTS: The VAS scores were significantly lower in the Internal Fixation Group (IFG) than in the External Fixation Group (EFG) on the seventh day and one month postoperatively (P < 0.05). Although both groups showed no significant anxiety, depression, or insomnia before surgery (P > 0.05), the EFG showed significantly higher HADS-A, HADS-D, and AIS scores than the IFG at seven days and one and three months postoperatively (P < 0.05). Additionally, changes in HADS-A, HADS-D, and AIS scores were most significant at day seven post-surgery in the EFG (P < 0.05). Furthermore, no significant difference was found between the two groups in the average Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores before surgery (P > 0.05). However, both groups showed positive changes in PCS and MCS scores at postoperative day seven and one and three months postoperatively, with the IFG having significantly higher average PCS and MCS scores compared to the EFG (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Compared to external fixation, internal fixation did not significantly impact patients' emotions regarding anxiety and depression in the early postoperative period, and physical and mental health recovery was better during the postoperative rehabilitation period. Furthermore, when there are no absolute indications, the impact on patients' psychological well-being should be considered as one of the key factors in the treatment plan during surgical approach selection.


Assuntos
Fraturas Ósseas , Distúrbios do Início e da Manutenção do Sono , Humanos , Qualidade de Vida , Distúrbios do Início e da Manutenção do Sono/etiologia , Fixadores Externos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fixação de Fratura/efeitos adversos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/efeitos adversos , Fenômenos Físicos
2.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol ; 34(3): 1707-1710, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38236397

RESUMO

Femoral head fractures are rare traumatic injuries that are usually associated with hip dislocations. Open reduction and internal fixation are performed when indicated, but can be associated with a higher risk of avascular necrosis. We report the case of a 24-year-old patient with a Pipkin type II fracture dislocation of the femoral head fixed via a minimally invasive three-dimensional navigated internal fixation technique. This technique minimizes deep soft tissue dissection to the hip capsule and associated vascularity and allows for accurate implant positioning.Level of evidence: Therapeutic case report Level IV.


Assuntos
Fraturas do Fêmur , Luxação do Quadril , Fraturas do Quadril , Humanos , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Cabeça do Fêmur/diagnóstico por imagem , Cabeça do Fêmur/cirurgia , Cabeça do Fêmur/lesões , Fixação de Fratura/efeitos adversos , Luxação do Quadril/diagnóstico por imagem , Luxação do Quadril/cirurgia , Luxação do Quadril/complicações , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Fraturas do Fêmur/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas do Fêmur/cirurgia , Fraturas do Fêmur/complicações , Resultado do Tratamento , Fraturas do Quadril/cirurgia
3.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol ; 34(1): 161-166, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37386191

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Fracture blisters, a common soft-tissue complication of pilon fractures, are associated with post-operative wound infections, delays in definitive fixation, and alterations in surgical plan. The purpose of this study was to (1) identify the delay in surgery attributable to the presence fracture blisters and (2) investigate the relationship of fracture blisters to comorbidities and fracture severity. METHODS: Patients with pilon fractures at an urban level 1 Trauma center from 2010 to 2021 were identified. The presence or absence of fracture blisters was noted, along with location. Demographic information, time from injury to external fixator placement, and time to definitive open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) were collected. Pilon fractures were classified according to AO/OTA guidelines using CT imaging and plain radiographs. RESULTS: 314 patients with pilon fractures were available for analysis, eighty (25%) of whom were found to have fracture blisters. Patients with fracture blisters had longer time to surgery compared to those without fracture blisters (14.2 days vs 7.9 days, p < 0.001). A greater proportion of patients with fracture blisters had AO/OTA 43C fracture patterns, compared with those without fracture blisters (71.3% vs 53.8%, p = 0.03). Fractures blisters were less likely to be localized over the posterior ankle (12%, p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: The presence of fracture blisters in pilon fractures are associated with significant delays in time to definitive fixation and higher energy fracture patterns. Fracture blisters are less commonly located over the posterior ankle which may support the implementation of a staged posterolateral approach when managing these injures.


Assuntos
Fraturas do Tornozelo , Traumatismos do Tornozelo , Fraturas da Tíbia , Humanos , Vesícula/etiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Traumatismos do Tornozelo/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fraturas da Tíbia/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas da Tíbia/cirurgia , Fraturas do Tornozelo/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas do Tornozelo/cirurgia , Fixação de Fratura/efeitos adversos , Fixação de Fratura/métodos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/efeitos adversos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos
4.
J Foot Ankle Surg ; 63(2): 237-240, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38043598

RESUMO

Charcot reconstruction with static external fixation provides stability in deformity correction. Concern for pin site health remains forefront to prevent premature fixator removal should infection develop. While previous investigations examined a spectrum of pin care protocol with a similar variation in outcomes, this study assesses results following a "no care pin care" routine. A retrospective analysis of patients with Charcot neuroarthropathy treated with static external fixation was performed where all pin sites were dressed using a chlorhexidine-soaked sponge without postoperative maintenance. Demographics, reconstruction-specific, and postoperative variables including pin site irritation, pin site infection, and pin tract infection were collected through frame removal. A comparison between uncomplicated and complicated pin sites was made. Statistical significance was set as p ≤ .05. Among 85 patients and their respective pin holes that posed potential spots of infection, 6 (7%) experienced pin site irritation and 5 (6%) experienced pin site infection. Moreover, 2 (2%) experienced a pin tract infection requiring removal. Out of the 768 wires/half-pins 2 (0.3%) were removed. There existed no statistically significant predictors of pin site irritation/infection other than age (p = .03). "No care pin care" proves an effective means at pin site care following static external fixation in Charcot reconstruction. Limited maintenance reduces the postoperative burden on providers and patients.


Assuntos
Fixadores Externos , Fixação de Fratura , Humanos , Fixadores Externos/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fixação de Fratura/efeitos adversos , Pinos Ortopédicos , Fios Ortopédicos
5.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol ; 34(1): 353-361, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37530905

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The management of failed tibial fracture fixation remains a challenge for orthopaedic surgeons. This study investigate the utility and outcomes of circular external fixation in the management of failed internal fixation of tibial fractures. METHODS: Retrospective review of a prospectively collected database of a complex limb reconstruction unit at a major trauma centre was done during December 2022. Patients with failed internal fixation of tibial fracture who underwent revision surgery with circular external fixation frame were included. RESULTS: 20 patients with a mean age of 47.8 ± 16.5 years (range: 15-69) were included. Fourteen (70.0%) patients had failed plate and screws fixations, and the remaining six (30.0%) failed intramedullary nail fixation. The most common indication for revision surgery was development of early postoperative surgical site infection (5 patients; 25.0%). The mean duration of frame treatment was 199.5 ± 80.1 days (range = 49-364), while the mean follow-up duration following frame removal was 3.2 ± 1.8 years (range = 2-8). The overall union rate in this series was 100%; and all infected cases had complete resolution from infection. The total number of complications was 11, however, only two complications required surgical intervention. The most common complications reported were pin site infection (6; 30.0%) and limb length discrepancy of 2 cm (2; 10.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Circular external fixation is a reliable surgical option in the treatment of failed internal fixation of tibia fractures. This technique can provide limb salvage in complex infected and noninfected cases with a high union rate and minimal major complications.


Assuntos
Tíbia , Fraturas da Tíbia , Humanos , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tíbia/cirurgia , Fixação de Fratura/efeitos adversos , Fixação de Fratura/métodos , Fixadores Externos , Resultado do Tratamento , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/efeitos adversos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Fraturas da Tíbia/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos
6.
J Hand Surg Eur Vol ; 49(3): 310-315, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37666217

RESUMO

We assessed operatively treated closed distal radial fractures to identify independent risk factors for surgical site infection after treatment. A retrospective review was carried out of 531 operatively treated closed distal radial fractures over a 5-year period. Multiple logistic regression was performed with infection as the dependent variable, using a stepwise regression procedure to select variables to construct the final model. In total, 19 (3.6%) fractures were complicated by postoperative surgical site infection. Uncontrolled diabetes with HbA1c >7, the presence of external fixation or external Kirschner wires, and tobacco use were significant independent predictors of infection. Age and time in the operating room were also statistically significant predictors but deemed to be not clinically meaningful.Level of evidence: IV.


Assuntos
Fraturas do Rádio , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica , Humanos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Fraturas do Rádio/cirurgia , Fraturas do Rádio/etiologia , Fixação de Fratura/efeitos adversos , Fixação de Fratura/métodos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/efeitos adversos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fios Ortopédicos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
Int Wound J ; 21(4): e14639, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38153200

RESUMO

Surgical site infections (SSIs) following ankle fracture fixation pose significant challenges in patient recovery and healthcare management. Identifying risk factors contributing to SSIs can aid in developing targeted prevention and treatment strategies. This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines and the PICO framework. A comprehensive literature search across major databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library, was completed on September 26, 2023. The inclusion criteria encompassed peer-reviewed studies of various designs that investigated risk factors for SSIs post-ankle fracture fixation. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Statistical analyses assessed heterogeneity and calculated combined effect sizes using fixed- or random-effects models, depending on the heterogeneity observed. The initial search yielded 1250 articles, with seven meeting the inclusion criteria after rigorous screening and full-text review. The included studies, conducted between 2006 and 2019, predominantly utilized case-control designs. The meta-analysis identified diabetes, open fractures, smoking, age, alcohol consumption, ASA score ≥3, high BMI, contaminated incisions, fracture dislocation and heart disease as significant risk factors for postoperative SSIs. Publication bias assessment showed no significant bias across studies. The identification of key risk factors such as diabetes, open fractures, smoking, advanced age, alcohol consumption, high ASA score, elevated BMI, contaminated incisions, fracture dislocation and heart disease is essential in managing SSIs post-ankle fracture fixation. Targeted interventions addressing these risk factors are crucial to reduce the incidence of SSIs and improve overall patient outcomes.


Assuntos
Fraturas do Tornozelo , Diabetes Mellitus , Fratura-Luxação , Fraturas Expostas , Cardiopatias , Ferida Cirúrgica , Humanos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Tornozelo , Fraturas do Tornozelo/cirurgia , Fraturas do Tornozelo/complicações , Fixação de Fratura/efeitos adversos , Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Fatores de Risco , Fratura-Luxação/complicações , Cardiopatias/complicações
8.
Int Orthop ; 48(2): 365-388, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38148379

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Although bone transport is a well-recognised technique to address segmental bone defects, optimal management of docking sites is not absolutely determined. Some surgeons routinely intervene in all cases, and others prefer to observe and intervene only if spontaneous union does not occur. Primary aim of the study was to compare rates of docking site union between patients who underwent routine docking site intervention and those who did not. METHODS: A systematic literature review using the keywords "bone transport", "docking", "tibia", and "femur" was performed in PubMed using PRISMA guidelines. Studies published in English from January 2000 to August 2022 were included and assessed independently by two reviewers. Pooled analysis was undertaken dividing patients into two groups: those managed by routine intervention and those initially observed. RESULTS: Twenty-three clinical studies met the eligibility criteria for pooled analysis, including 1153 patients, 407 in the routine intervention and 746 in the observed group. The rate of union after initial treatment was 90% in the routine intervention group and 66% in the observed group (p < 0.0001). Overall union rates at the end of treatment were similar at 99% in both groups. Patients in the observed group required an average of 2.2 procedures to achieve union overall compared with 3.8 in the routine intervention group. Time in frame was similar between groups. CONCLUSION: Based on the current literature, routine docking site interventions cannot be recommended, since this may lead to unnecessary interventions in two thirds of patients. Timely selective intervention in those at high risk or after a defined period of observation would appear to be a logical approach.


Assuntos
Fixadores Externos , Fixação de Fratura , Humanos , Fixação de Fratura/efeitos adversos , Fixação de Fratura/métodos , Tíbia/cirurgia , Fêmur , Resultado do Tratamento , Estudos Retrospectivos
9.
BMJ Case Rep ; 16(12)2023 Dec 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38056932

RESUMO

Bladder injury is frequently associated with complex pelvic fractures with men being the predominant population to sustain such injuries. Entrapment of the bladder through the site of pelvic fracture is a rare clinical entity. We report a case of an entrapped bladder post closed reduction and external fixation of an unstable anteroposterior compression type 3 (APC-3) fracture. This report highlights the diagnostic difficulty with identifying an entrapped bladder and the patient's functional outcome after 1 year of follow-up.


Assuntos
Fraturas Ósseas , Fraturas por Compressão , Ossos Pélvicos , Sínfise Pubiana , Bexiga Urinária , Humanos , Masculino , Fixadores Externos/efeitos adversos , Fixação de Fratura/efeitos adversos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/efeitos adversos , Fraturas Ósseas/complicações , Fraturas Ósseas/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas Ósseas/cirurgia , Ossos Pélvicos/lesões , Ossos Pélvicos/cirurgia , Sínfise Pubiana/diagnóstico por imagem , Bexiga Urinária/diagnóstico por imagem , Bexiga Urinária/lesões , Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia
10.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 24(1): 962, 2023 Dec 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38082305

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Open distal tibial fractures pose significant challenges regarding treatment options and patient outcomes. This retrospective single-centre study aimed to compare the stability, clinical outcomes, complications, and financial implications of two surgical interventions, namely the external locking plate and the combined frame external fixator, to manage open distal tibial fractures. METHODS: Forty-four patients with distal open tibial (metaphyseal extraarticular) fractures treated between 2020 and 2022 were selected and formed into two main groups, Group A and Group B. Group A (19 patients) are patients that underwent treatment using the external locking plate technique, while Group B (25 patients) received the combined frame external fixator approach. Age, gender, inpatient stay, re-operation rates, complications, functional recovery (measured by the Johner-Wrush score), pain ratings (measured by the Visual Analogue Scale [VAS]), and cost analyses were evaluated for each group. Statistical analyses using SPSS were conducted to compare the outcomes between the two groups. RESULTS: The research found significant variations in clinical outcomes, complications, and cost consequences between Group A and Group B. Group A had fewer hospitalisation periods (23.687.74) than Group B (33.5619.47). Re-operation rates were also considerably lower in Group A (26.3%) than in Group B (48%), owing to a greater prevalence of pin-tract infections and subsequent pin loosening in the combination frame external fixator group. The estimated cost of both techniques was recorded and analysed with the locking average of 26,619.69 ± 9,602.352 and the combined frame average of 39,095.64 ± 20,070.077. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that although the two approaches effectively manage open distal tibia fractures, the locking compression plate approach (Group A) has an advantage in treating open distal tibia fractures. Shorter hospitalisation times, reduced re-operation rates, and fewer complications will benefit patients, healthcare systems, and budget allocation. Group A's functional recovery results demonstrate the locking plate technique's ability to improve recovery and patient quality of life. According to the cost analysis, the locking plate technique's economic viability and cost-effectiveness may optimise healthcare resources for open distal tibia fractures. These findings might improve patient outcomes and inform evidence-based orthopaedic surgery.


Assuntos
Fraturas Expostas , Fraturas da Tíbia , Humanos , Tíbia/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Fixadores Externos , Fraturas da Tíbia/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas da Tíbia/cirurgia , Fixação de Fratura/efeitos adversos , Fixação de Fratura/métodos , Fraturas Expostas/cirurgia , Placas Ósseas , Resultado do Tratamento
11.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 24(1): 899, 2023 Nov 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37980527

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the therapeutic effects of Kirschner wire fixation and external fixation in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures in older children and adolescents. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of older children and adolescents who underwent surgery at our institution for proximal humeral fractures between April 2014 and May 2022. One group (n = 28) underwent fracture reduction and Kirschner wire fixation, and the other group (n = 23) underwent external fixation. During the follow-up, the differences in shoulder joint function between the two groups were compared by analysing Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick DASH) and Constant-Murley scores. Postoperative complications were also recorded. RESULTS: The operation time of the Kirschner wire group was shorter than that of the external fixation group (69.07 ± 11.34 min vs. 77.39 ± 15.74 min, P = 0.33). The time to remove the fixator in the external fixation group was shorter than that in the Kirschner wire group (6.74 ± 1.57 vs. 7.61 ± 1.22, P = 0.032). The Quick DASH score and Constant-Murley score of the patients in the external fixation group were significantly better than those in the Kirschner wire group at 3 months after surgery (5.63 ± 4.33 vs. 8.93 ± 6.40, P = 0.040; 93.78 ± 2.43 vs. 91.75 ± 2.15, P = 0.003). There was no significant difference in the Quick DASH score or Constant-Murley score between the patients in the external fixator group and those in the Kirschner wire group at 9 months after the operation (2.77 ± 3.14 vs. 3.17 ± 3.68, P = 0.683; 97.39 ± 1.80 vs. 96.57 ± 2.15, P = 0.152). The most common complication of the two groups was pin tract infection. The incidence rate of infection was higher in the external fixation group than that in the Kirschner wire group (9 vs. 4, P = 0.043). CONCLUSION: Both Kirschner wire fixation and external fixation of N-H III and IV proximal humeral fractures in older children and adolescents produce good outcomes. External fixation is a preferred surgical treatment option for paediatric proximal humerus fractures because early mobilization of the affected limb can be realized.


Assuntos
Fraturas do Úmero , Fraturas do Ombro , Humanos , Criança , Adolescente , Fios Ortopédicos , Fixação de Fratura/efeitos adversos , Fixadores Externos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fraturas do Ombro/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas do Ombro/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Fraturas do Úmero/cirurgia
12.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 24(1): 880, 2023 Nov 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37951888

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Ankle fracture-dislocations are among the most severe injuries, and the use of an external fixator as a recommended fixation method has some disadvantages. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes and complication rates of external and K-wire fixations in the treatment of ankle fracture dislocations. METHODS: A total of 67 patients with ankle fracture-dislocations requiring temporary external or percutaneous K-wire fixation were included. The exclusion criteria were pilon fractures, open fractures, and those who required acute open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) score (range 0-10), and complications before and after the definitive surgery were recorded. RESULTS: A significant difference between the two groups was not observed for age, sex, affected side, fracture type, smoking status, or diabetes. The average AOFAS scores were 83.2 and 83.3, the median VAS scores were 3 and 3, and the complication rates were 32.4% and 6.7% in the external and K-wire fixation groups, respectively (p = 0.010). However, skin necrosis, re-dislocation of the ankle, surgical wound infection, and posttraumatic ankle osteoarthritis frequency were not significantly different between the groups, except for pin-sites infection (p = 0.036). CONCLUSION: Ankle fracture-dislocations using percutaneous k-wire fixation showed a low rate of complications and favorable clinical outcomes. This method could be a good alternative treatment option for ankle fracture-dislocations.


Assuntos
Fraturas do Tornozelo , Fratura-Luxação , Humanos , Fraturas do Tornozelo/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas do Tornozelo/cirurgia , Fraturas do Tornozelo/etiologia , Tornozelo , Resultado do Tratamento , Fixação de Fratura/efeitos adversos , Fixação de Fratura/métodos , Fixadores Externos/efeitos adversos , Fratura-Luxação/diagnóstico por imagem , Fratura-Luxação/cirurgia , Fratura-Luxação/etiologia , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos
13.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 11: CD008628, 2023 11 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37933733

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Fractures of the calcaneus (heel bone) comprise up to 2% of all fractures. These fractures are mostly caused by a fall from a height, and are common in younger adults. Treatment can be surgical or non-surgical; however, there is clinical uncertainty over optimal management. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2013. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects (benefits and harms) of surgical versus conservative treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and clinical trials registers in November 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing surgical versus non-surgical management of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures in skeletally mature adults (older than 14 years of age). For surgical treatment, we included closed manipulation with percutaneous wire fixation, open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF) with or without bone graft, or primary arthrodesis. For non-surgical treatment, we included ice, elevation and rest, or plaster cast or splint immobilisation. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methodological procedures. We collected data for the following outcomes: function in the short term (within three months of injury) or long term (more than three months after injury), chronic pain, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and ability to return to normal activities, as well as complications which may or may not have led to an unplanned return to theatre. MAIN RESULTS: We included 10 RCTs and two quasi-RCTs with 1097 participants. Sample sizes in studies ranged from 29 to 424 participants. Most participants were male (86%), and the mean age in studies ranged from 28 to 52 years. In the surgical groups, participants were mostly managed with ORIF with plates, screws, or wires; one study used only minimally invasive techniques. Participants in the non-surgical groups were managed with a plaster cast, removable splint or a bandage, or with rest, elevation, and sometimes ice. Risk of performance bias was unavoidably high in all studies as it was not possible to blind participants and personnel to treatment; in addition, some studies were at high or unclear risk of other types of bias (including high risk of selection bias for quasi-RCTs, high risk of attrition bias, and unclear risk of selective reporting bias). We downgraded the certainty of all the evidence for serious risk of bias. We also downgraded the certainty of the evidence for imprecision for all outcomes (except for complications requiring return to theatre for subtalar arthrodesis) because the evidence was derived from few participants. We downgraded the evidence for subtalar arthrodesis for inconsistency because the pooled data included high levels of statistical heterogeneity. We found that surgical management may improve function at six to 24 months after injury when measured using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score (mean difference (MD) 6.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04 to 12.12; 5 studies, 319 participants; low-certainty evidence). We are not aware of a published minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the AOFAS score for this type of fracture. Previously published MCIDs for other foot conditions range from 2.0 to 7.9. No studies reported short-term function within three months of injury. Surgical management may reduce the number of people with chronic pain up to 24 months after injury (risk ratio (RR) 0.56, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.84; 4 studies, 175 participants; low-certainty evidence); this equates to 295 per 1000 fewer people with pain after surgical management (95% CI 107 to 422 per 1000). Surgical management may also lead to improved physical HRQoL (MD 6.49, 95% CI 2.49 to 10.48; 2 studies, 192 participants; low-certainty evidence). This outcome was measured using the physical component score of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey. We used a change in effect of 5% to indicate a clinically important difference for this scoring system and thus judged that the difference in HRQoL between people treated surgically or non-surgically includes both clinically relevant and not relevant changes for those treated surgically. There may be little or no difference in the number of people who returned to work within 24 months (RR 1.26, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.68; 5 studies, 250 participants; low-certainty evidence) or who require secondary surgery for subtalar arthrodesis (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.09 to 1.53; 3 studies, 657 participants; low-certainty evidence). For other complications requiring return to theatre in people treated surgically, we found low-certainty evidence for amputation (2.4%; 1 study, 42 participants), implant removal (3.4%; 3 studies, 321 participants), deep infection (5.3%; 1 study, 206 participants), and wound debridement (2.7%; 1 study, 73 participants). We found low-certainty evidence that 14% of participants who were treated surgically (7 studies, 847 participants) had superficial site infection. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Our confidence in the evidence is limited. Although pooled evidence indicated that surgical treatment may lead to improved functional outcome but with an increased risk of unplanned second operations, we judged the evidence to be of low certainty as it was often derived from few participants in studies that were not sufficiently robust in design. We found no evidence of a difference between treatment options in the number of people who needed late reconstruction surgery for subtalar arthritis, although the estimate included the possibility of important harms and benefits. Large, well-conducted studies that attempt to minimise detection bias and that measure functional outcomes using calcaneal-specific measurement tools would increase the confidence in these findings. Given that minimally invasive surgical procedures are already becoming more prevalent in practice, research is urgently needed to determine whether these newer surgical techniques offer better outcomes with regard to function, pain, quality of life, and postoperative complications for intra-articular displaced calcaneal fractures.


Assuntos
Dor Crônica , Fraturas Ósseas , Masculino , Adulto , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Fixação de Fratura/efeitos adversos , Dor Crônica/etiologia , Gelo , Bandagens
14.
J Clin Anesth ; 91: 111275, 2023 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37797395

RESUMO

Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) has become an increasingly common management strategy for traumatic rib fractures. Although historically managed with supportive care, patients with multiple rib fractures and flail chest increasingly undergo SSRF, and so the anesthesiologist must be well-versed in the perioperative management and pain control for these patients, as controlling pain in this population is associated with decreased length of stay and improved outcomes. There are multiple modalities that can be used for both pain control and as part of the anesthetic plan in patients undergoing SSRF. This narrative review provides a comprehensive summary of anesthetic considerations for surgical rib fracture patients, covering the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative periods. We describe an approach to the assessment of high-risk patients, analgesic and anesthetic techniques including emerging techniques within locoregional anesthesia, ventilation strategies, and potential complications. This review also identifies areas where additional research is needed to ensure optimal anesthetic management for patients undergoing SSRF.


Assuntos
Anestésicos , Fraturas das Costelas , Humanos , Fraturas das Costelas/complicações , Fraturas das Costelas/cirurgia , Fixação de Fratura/efeitos adversos , Fixação de Fratura/métodos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/efeitos adversos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Tempo de Internação , Dor , Estudos Retrospectivos
16.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 24(1): 832, 2023 Oct 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37872566

RESUMO

PURPOSE: This study was conducted aimed at comparing the curative effect of external fixation combined with Kirschner wire fixation versus hollow screw fixation in the treatment of first metacarpal bone base fracture. METHODS: The current retrospective study included a total of 80 patients diagnosed with first metacarpal bone base fracture who were admitted in Wuxi 9th People's Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University between October 2017 and October 2020. The patients enrolled were equally divided into the combined group (40 cases, receiving external fixation combined with Kirschner wire fixation), and the control group (40 cases, receiving hollow screw fixation). Perioperative indices were collected and compared between the two groups. Pain scores before operation and three months, six months, and one year after operation were compared. Additionally, we compared the finger function in the last follow-up visit ( the follow-up period was 1 year) and rate of complications. RESULTS: Operation time, amount of bleeding, length of incision, length of hospital stay, and fracture healing time did not differ between the two groups (all P > 0.05). Pain score was comparable between the two groups before operation (P = 0.704). Despite lower results showing at 3, 6, and 12 months after operation in both groups, the pain score did not significantly differ in any time point between the two groups (all P > 0.05). Additionally, no significant differences were observed in finger function and rate of complications at the last follow-up between the two groups (both P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: External fixation combined with Kirschner wire fixation and hollow screw fixation exhibited similar curative effect in treating first metacarpal bone base fracture, indicating both surgery methods may be considered as the preferred approach.


Assuntos
Fraturas Ósseas , Ossos Metacarpais , Humanos , Fios Ortopédicos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ossos Metacarpais/diagnóstico por imagem , Ossos Metacarpais/cirurgia , Fixadores Externos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/efeitos adversos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Fixação de Fratura/efeitos adversos , Fraturas Ósseas/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas Ósseas/cirurgia , Parafusos Ósseos , Dor
17.
Injury ; 54(12): 111086, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37827874

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Civilian gunshot fractures of the pelvic ring represent a unique challenge for orthopaedic surgeons due to a high incidence of complicating associated injuries. Internationally accepted guidelines for these injuries are not available. The aim of this review is to summarize the available literature and to provide concise management recommendations. METHODS: Literature search was performed using PubMed. The review focuses on civilian gunshot fractures of the pelvic ring and includes the acetabulum and hip joint only where it was deemed necessary for the understanding of the management of these patients. RESULTS: The management of civilian transpelvic gunshot fractures is complicated by potentially life-threatening associated injuries, the risk of contamination with bowel content and retained bullets in joints. The infection risk is higher compared to extremity gunshot fractures. There is no clear evidence for the use of antibiotics available. The studies focusing on civilian pelvic ring gunshot fractures reported no case of orthopaedic fracture fixation in their series. Routine wash-out and debridement of fractures is not warranted based on the literature but conflicting recommendations for surgical interventions exist. CONCLUSION: There is limited evidence available for civilian transpelvic gunshot fractures. The high frequency of associated injuries requires a thorough clinical examination and multidisciplinary management. We recommend routine antibiotic prophylaxis for all transpelvic gunshots. For fractures with a high risk of infection, a minimum of 24 h broad-spectrum antibiotics is recommended. The indication for orthopaedic fixation of civilian transpelvic gunshot fractures is based on the assessment of the stability of the fracture and is rarely necessary. Although conflicting recommendations exist, routine wash-out and debridement is not recommended based on the literature. Bullets buried in bone without contact to synovial fluid do not warrant removal, unless they have traversed large bowel and are accessible without undue morbidity. Furthermore, bullets should be routinely removed if they are retained in the hip joint, if mechanical irritation of soft tissues by projectiles is expected or if the bullet traversed large bowel before entering the hip joint.


Assuntos
Fraturas Ósseas , Ossos Pélvicos , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo , Humanos , Fraturas Ósseas/cirurgia , Fraturas Ósseas/complicações , Fixação de Fratura/efeitos adversos , Ossos Pélvicos/cirurgia , Ossos Pélvicos/lesões , Pelve/lesões , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/cirurgia , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/complicações , Antibacterianos , Estudos Retrospectivos
18.
J Craniofac Surg ; 34(6): 1717-1721, 2023 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37458265

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Nasoorbitoethmoid (NOE) fractures impact growth of the craniofacial skeleton in children, which may necessitate differentiated management from adult injuries. This study describes characteristics, management, and outcomes of NOE fractures in children seen at a single institution. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients under 18 years who presented to our institution from 2006 to 2021 with facial fractures was conducted; patients with NOE fractures were included. Data collected included demographics, mechanism of injury, fracture type, management, and outcomes. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients met inclusion criteria; 77.6% presented with Manson-Marcowitz Type I fractures, 17.2% with Type II, and 5.2% with Type III. The most common cause of injury was motor vehicle accidents (MVAs, 39.7%) and sports (31%). Glasgow Coma Scale and injury mechanism were not predictive of injury severity in the pediatric population ( P =0.353, P =0.493). Orbital fractures were the most common associated fractures (n=55, 94.8%); parietal bone fractures were more likely in Type III fractures ( P =0.047). LeFort III fractures were more likely in type II fractures ( P =0.011). Soft tissue and neurological injuries were the most common associated injuries regardless of NOE fracture type (81% and 58.6%, respectively). There was no significant difference in type of operative management or in the rates of adverse outcomes between types of NOE fractures. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that pediatric NOE fractures, although rare, present differently from adult NOE fractures and that revisiting predictive heuristics and treatment strategies is warranted in this population.


Assuntos
Fraturas Múltiplas , Fraturas Maxilares , Fraturas Orbitárias , Fraturas Cranianas , Criança , Humanos , Adolescente , Fraturas Cranianas/epidemiologia , Fraturas Cranianas/cirurgia , Fraturas Orbitárias/epidemiologia , Fraturas Orbitárias/cirurgia , Fraturas Orbitárias/complicações , Fixação de Fratura/efeitos adversos , Osso Nasal/lesões , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fraturas Múltiplas/complicações
19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37428152

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Geriatric hip fractures are common and associated with high morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence, timing, and risk factors of contralateral hip fracture after initial hip fracture. METHODS: Initial hip fractures in patients older than 65 years were abstracted from the national, administrative M91Ortho PearlDiver data set. Incidence and timing of contralateral hip fractures in the following 10 years were identified. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis until contralateral hip fracture was conducted. To account for patient mortality over the later years, 2-year univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine factors predictive of contralateral hip fracture. RESULTS: Of the initial 104,311 hip fractures identified, contralateral hip fracture in the 10 years that followed was identified for 7,186 (6.9%), of which 68.4% occurred in the first 2 years. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis until contralateral fracture revealed the 10-year incidence to be 12.9% when controlling for those lost from the data set during the study period. Multivariate logistic regression revealed independent predictors of contralateral hip fracture in the 2 years after index hip fracture, when the incidence was greatest, to be female sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.15), body mass index < 20 (OR 1.30), and percutaneous pinning surgery for initial hip fracture fixation (OR 1.58) (P < 0.0001 for each). CONCLUSIONS: In a national cohort of 104,311 geriatric hip fractures, Kaplan-Meier analysis for contralateral hip fracture found the 10-year incidence to be 12.9%, of which nearly 70% were in the first 2 years, and predisposing factors were defined. As such, future research should aim to identify the cause and mitigate the risk of secondary contralateral hip fractures in geriatric patients.


Assuntos
Fraturas do Quadril , Humanos , Feminino , Idoso , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fraturas do Quadril/epidemiologia , Fraturas do Quadril/etiologia , Fraturas do Quadril/cirurgia , Fatores de Risco , Fixação de Fratura/efeitos adversos
20.
Int Orthop ; 47(7): 1677-1687, 2023 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37195466

RESUMO

PURPOSE: It is known that the magnitude of surgery and timing of surgical procedures represents a crucial step of care in polytraumatized patients. In contrast, it is not clear which specific factors are most critical when evaluating the surgical load (physiologic burden to the patient incurred by surgical procedures). Additionally, there is a dearth of evidence for which body region and surgical procedures are associated with high surgical burden. The aim of this study was to identify key factors and quantify the surgical load for different types of fracture fixation in multiple anatomic regions. METHODS: A standardized questionnaire was developed by experts from Société Internationale de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de Traumatologie (SICOT)-Trauma committee. Questions included relevance and composition of the surgical load, operational staging criteria, and stratification of operation procedures in different anatomic regions. Quantitative values according to a five-point Likert scale were chosen by the correspondents to determine the surgical load value based on their expertise. The surgical load for different surgical procedures in different body regions could be chosen in a range between "1," defined as the surgical load equivalent to external (monolateral) fixator application, and "5," defined as the maximal surgical load possible in that specific anatomic region. RESULTS: This questionnaire was completed online by 196 trauma surgeons from 61 countries in between Jun 26, 2022, and July 16, 2022 that are members of SICOT. The surgical load (SL) overall was considered very important by 77.0% of correspondents and important by 20.9% correspondents. Intraoperative blood loss (43.2%) and soft tissue damage (29.6%) were chosen as the most significant factors by participating surgeons. The decision for staged procedures was dictated by involved body region (56.1%), followed by bleeding risk (18.9%) and fracture complexity (9.2%). Percutaneous or intramedullary procedures as well as fractures in distal anatomic regions, such as hands, ankles, and feet, were consistently ranked lower in their surgical load. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates a consensus in the trauma community about the crucial relevance of the surgical load in polytrauma care. The surgical load is ranked higher with increased intraoperative bleeding and greater soft tissue damage/extent of surgical approach and depends relevantly on the anatomic region and kind of operative procedure. The experts especially consider anatomic regions and the risk of intraoperative bleeding as well as fracture complexity to guide staging protocols. Specialized guidance and teaching is required to assess both the patient's physiological status and the estimated surgical load reliably in the preoperative decision-making and operative staging.


Assuntos
Fraturas Ósseas , Humanos , Fraturas Ósseas/cirurgia , Fixação de Fratura/efeitos adversos , Fixação de Fratura/métodos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Tornozelo , Consenso
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...